Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Most recent articles

Posted by on Aug 16, 2012 in Photoshop | 5 comments

Photoshop Myth Busters (And The Problem With Web Content That Never Dies)


 
I’ve been tossing around a series of posts called “Photoshop Myth Busters” for a while now and I thought I’d start one today. Basically, the idea came to me at a seminar a few months back when some one came up and asked a question about resizing. He said that he’d seen a tutorial (by me no less), where I talked about resizing images in 10% increments (rather than just changing to the size you need all at once) to get better quality resizing. Then he asked why (on that day) I just taught to open the Image Resize dialog in Photoshop, and resize it all at once. The answer is pretty simple… the old way is no longer relevant. In some ways it’s a myth (something that is widely believed, but false). Now that doesn’t mean it wasn’t true at one point. Myth may not be the perfect word here, because it implies that the topic was never really true. But it makes for a better blog title than “Photoshop things that were true at one time, but aren’t true any more” :)

Back to our story on the resizing thing. At one point in time (many years ago), it was indeed actually better to resize your photos in 10% increments. You got better results that way. But today, Adobe has refined their resizing algorithms so much, that all you need to do is look through a list and pick the one that best suits what you’re doing and you’ll get the best results. If you’re enlarging photos, no sweat. They’ve got one for that. Making photos smaller. Yep, there’s one for that too. That’s it. Pretty simple huh and a lot better than opening the Image Size dialog box a bunch of times every time you wanted to resize a photo.

Myth Status: BUSTED!

As a side point, one of the problems we encounter with content that never dies on the web is that sometimes it’s old content. In the case of, say, an explanation of what aperture is in photography – you could go back 20 years and find an explanation that would work just fine and still hold true today. But when it comes to software, if the tutorial you watch is any more than 2 years old (and sometimes even less than that), then you’ve got to be careful. Software and technology change so much that techniques and tools I used two years ago in Photoshop or Lightroom, are no longer applicable today. That’s just the world we live in. So if you hear something I said in a tutorial a long time ago, disregard it – I was probably drunk when I said it anyway ;) Totally just kidding! It may or may not be true. If you’re wondering, just stop by, leave a message, tweet, or whatever and ask.

Thanks for stopping by. Have a good one!

Read More

Posted by on Aug 15, 2012 in Lightroom | 13 comments

Video Tutorial: Before and After with Lightroom and Photoshop (and a black & white conversion)


 
Hey everyone. I’ve got another Before/After video for you where I start from scratch in Lightroom, jump into Photoshop and back to Lightroom (but don’t forget to scroll down because there’s another post today). I’m even throwing in a black & white conversion in Nik’s Silver Efex Pro at the end. I mention in the video that I’m writing something more about the B&W conversion, but unfortunately I won’t get the chance to put it up this week. So check back next week for the full story on this photo. In the meantime, enjoy the video.

Have a good one!

Read More

Posted by on Aug 15, 2012 in Personal | 1 comment

My Speaking/Teaching/Shooting Update For the Next Few Months


 
Hey everyone. Thought I’d give a quick update of where I’ll be teaching/shooting/traveling over the next few months in case anyone is in the area and wants to attend, or meet up and shoot.

August 20-23: Portland shooting whatever I can find and visiting some friends at onOne.
August 24-25: I’ll be teaching my Lightroom seminar in Seattle.
September 4-7: Photoshop World in Las Vegas
September 10-11: Teaching my Lightroom seminar in St. Louis.
September 12-13: Teaching my Lightroom seminar in Kansas City
September 25-29: Hanging with Dave Black at his workshop in Jackson Hole/Grand Tetons
October 10: Teaching My Lightroom seminar in Orlando, FL
October 25-26: PDN Photoplus East in New York
November 3-7: Monument Valley workshop with RC Concepcion and Bill Fortney

If you’re interested in attending anything above each one should have a link attached with it. If you’re going to be in any of those areas and wanna shoot or have any good shooting ideas, then let me know :)

Read More

Posted by on Aug 14, 2012 in Photography, Story Behind the Photo | 14 comments

The Story Behind the Photo (Week 4)


 
This week you’re getting one of my photography learning moments that luckily resorted in a photo I could “fix” enough to show off. It was my first time shooting a Superbike race and boy did a learn a lot.

But First…The Story Behind, The Story Behind the Photo
A while back, Scott Sheppard interviewed me over on Nik Radio. It was basically a 30-40 minute interview on how I got into photography and Photoshop, what inspires me and a bunch of other things. Here’s the link in case you missed it. Well, toward the end of the interview, we started talking about how the story behind the photo is sometimes as captivating or interesting as the photo itself. So it got me thinking about a possible series of posts here on the blog. Let’s get started:

The Photo
(click for a larger version)

Location: Barber Motorsports Park in Birmingham, Alabama

Date: May, 2009

The Gear

The Story
A few years ago I was telling Scott that I really love superbikes and I’ve always wanted to get one of those photos where the rider is basically laying down on a turn, with his knee touching the ground. So Scott (being the great friend that he is), got me set up to shoot a race with him a few weeks later.

The day came and we got up at the crack of dawn to catch a flight out, so we could get there in time for the race. We try to minimize our time away from families since we travel a lot for work anyway. So we planned on flying out and back in the same day. We arrived at the track (where we met our friend Jeff Rease) just as one of the qualifying rounds of the superbike race was about to start. The tracks are pretty large, and it ended up taking much longer than we thought to get into a good shooting location. But we did. Now, at this point I still thought we had a whole day of shooting. I knew we had a 6pm flight back home, but it was noon, so I figured we were good to go and lots of shooting opportunities were yet to come.

My First Learning Experience
We get into place, and I’ve got my camera set up on Aperture Priority mode with my Aperture at f/2.8. I look and my shutter speeds are anywhere from 1/1000th to 1/1500th of a second so I know I’m going to get some sharp photos. And I did. There was a turn right in front of me and I was able to get the riders basically laying down on the ground as they went around the turn. I’m thinking to myself, “Man! This is easy!”. I ran over to Scott at one point to show him and he tells me “Dude, that’s great… But… they look like they’re frozen in air. You’ve got to get your shutter speed around 1/200th – 1/250th and pan to get some motion blur in the background”. Ah!!!! It was my first time and I didn’t do my research ahead of time (and was too stubborn to ask anyone first). Basically what Scott was saying is that if you shoot moving things (like cars, planes, people, motorcycles) at too high of a shutter speed, then they look like they’re frozen. 1/1000th of a second is going to freeze everything (including the background), even if you’re panning. So it looks like the motorcycle is standing still on the track.

I Can Catch on Quick
At this point, I’m thinking no problem. I understand what he was telling me and it made total sense. I switch over to Shutter Priority, set my shutter speed to 1/250th and let the camera choose the aperture. Then I start panning with the riders. It was at this point where I realized this stuff ain’t so easy. You’re shooting a moving object while you’re moving your camera at the same time. You’ve got to get your panning motion in sync with the bike in order to keep the motorcycle and rider sharp, but blur the background so it looks like they’re moving. A lot easier said then done, but I felt like I was getting the hang of it. I had a lot of blurry photos so far, but I was honing in on getting a good shot. Then… all of the sudden… it got quiet. The qualifying race ended and I barely got the chance to try out the things I learned. No sweat… I had all day right? ;)

Did I Mention That Thunderstorms Were Forecasted That Day? You See Where This Is Going Dontcha?
One thing I forgot to mention so far is that there had been a light rain happening on and off at this point. Well, as soon as that race ended, it started raining harder so they postponed the next races (which were the smaller sport bikes, not the big super bikes that look really cool). As the day went on it became painfully clear what was happening. By the time the rain ended and they resumed the races that got postponed, we realized the next superbike race wasn’t going to happen until after we left for the airport to head back that evening. Yup… that 15 minutes of shooting that I got earlier was going to be the only 15 minutes I had that day.

The Post-Processing
Post-processing was key here. Since I didn’t have a sharp photo with the background blurred, I had to fix this one in Photoshop after the fact. I made a selection of the background and applied Photoshop’s Motion Blur filter to it. It wasn’t easy though. It takes a bit of painful brushing to get the motion blur right up against the edge of your selection and get it to look realistic. Trust me, I wasn’t proud of having to do it that way. Don’t get me wrong. I actually like post-processing work in Photoshop. I enjoy the nature of working on my photos. But, in this case, I felt like it was more of a fix to take a bad photo and make it good – rather than using Photoshop for what I prefer which is to take a really good photo and make it great. It’s like replacing skies. I’m not happy about it. But hey, if I gotta do it, I’m not above it ;)

Lessons Learned
It’s simple. Ask for help early on :)

Thanks for stopping by today. I hope you enjoyed the story. Have a good one! :)

Read More

Posted by on Aug 13, 2012 in Lightroom | 19 comments

Lightroom 4 Presets – Big Sky Landscapes


 
So, we’re driving home last night, and I look west toward the beach to see this crazy-cool-cloudy sunset. We live in Florida and this time of year (with all of the thunderstorms out there), you can imagine some of the dramatic scenes we get. So it got me thinking about some more Lightroom 4 presets for photographs with skies that have really cool clouds in ‘em. (yes, Lightroom 4 only – not Lightroom 3)

There’s 4 different levels of intensity for this one. Light, Medium, Strong and (for the first time ever) Super Strong. I’ll warn you now. I think “Super Strong” is kind of over-the-top – but for all of your over-the-top lovers it’s worth a try :)

Here’s the before/after:

Enjoy!

Read More

Posted by on Aug 10, 2012 in Lightroom, Photoshop, Reviews | 0 comments

Some Thoughts on Reviews and a Quick Follow Up to the Tiffen Dfx Review

Hey everyone. First, don’t forget to scroll down to the next post. I’m giving away a ticket to my upcoming Lightroom seminars. Next… I wanted to post a quick follow up to the Tiffen review from yesterday. I realized from some questions I got on the social media sites, etc. that I’m missing part of the review. See, I try to give a review from two points-of-view. 1) A new un-biased user who may just be joining the photography industry and wants to know how good a product is and, 2) Me – some one who’s used a lot of products and definitely has some biases.

So it’s a really weird thing to write a review. In the case of Tiffen’s Dfx, as a new user I think it’s a great plug-in. It was easy to use, had some GREAT effects in it, with some really good features. As me, some one who definitely has a Nik and onOne bias, it’s probably not something that works it’s way into my everyday workflow. Not because it’s a bad product, but because I have years of experience using something else. Old habits die hard right?

Questions Are Good
The questions were good though. They made me realize there’s a few different audiences out there who read reviews. There’s the people that are just starting out and are wondering what product they should invest in, and there are those who use competing products and want to know if there’s something better out there.

Final Thoughts
In this case, There were a lot of people wondering if I’m switching over to Dfx from Nik or onOne. As an existing (and very biased) plug-in user, probably not. There are a few filters in there that I really liked so I’ll definitely keep my copy installed because Nik and onOne didn’t have those options. If I were a new user, I think Dfx definitely has a plug-in worth considering. Their effects were great and they have an incredibly easy way to view and apply them (as I mentioned yesterday, maybe even easier than some other plug-ins I use). Because I could see so many options and previews without actually clicking and moving sliders, I think it helped me be more creative and perhaps get some “looks” I would have never found elsewhere.

My advice still stands though. If you were just starting out, I’d say download the trials of any plug-in you wanted to use. See which one “fits” for you. Everyone responds to an interface differently. And fortunately the major plug-in makers all have a very different interface, so it’s not like you’d install them and think they’re all the same. They all have good effects, so the best thing would be to test ‘em out and see which one you tend to gravitate toward.

My lesson in the end though is that I’ll probably start including a section at the end of my reviews. Something like “Would I (or do I) use this product every day?” and then maybe something like “What if I were just starting out? Is this something I would use?”. As always thanks for your input.

Read More
Page 26 of 32« First...1020...2425262728...Last »